great info

Sunday, July 12, 2015

WHY jokowi, NO SORRY 9 convicted "BALI NINE"? Here's the explanation

Jokowi, the President of Indonesia, not a member of tolerance to the Australian government related to the DEATH PENALTY for convicted nine people were referred to as the Hall of Nine.

Bali Nine is the name given to the mass media nine Australians arrested on April 17, 2005 in Bali, Indonesia in an attempt to smuggle 8.2 kg of heroin from Indonesia to Australia. Four other people, Nguyen, Sukumaran, Chen and Norman were arrested at the Hotel Melasti in Kuta for storing a number of 350g of heroin and other items that indicate their involvement in the smuggling attempt.

Parents Rush and Lawrence then criticized the Australian police which was already aware of this smuggling scheme and chooses to notify the police rather than capture them in Australia, where there is no death penalty so that a ninth person can avoid the threat.

It's a great tandatanya, why not prohibit its citizens Australian side when out bringing narcotics into Bali? Myuran Sukumaran, Tan Duc Thanh Nguyen, Si Yi Chen and Matthew Norman was arrested in Kuta is currently preparing to send heroin phase two.

22 April 2005 Police called the Chan as the 'godfather' of the illegal operation of smuggling heroin.

27 September 2005 Bali High Prosecutor decides ninth Australian citizen, hereinafter known as the Bali Nine, were charged with possession and trafficking of heroin, the threat of a maximum of death penalty.

October 11, 2005 Bali Nine trials begin held at the Denpasar District Court.

January 24, 2006 Prosecutors demanded the death penalty for Sukumaran.

January 26, 2006 Chan also demanded the death penalty.

February 14, 2006 Denpasar District Court sentenced Chan and Sukumaran.

26 April 2006 Chan and Sukumaran appeal to the high court rejected.

May 10, 2011 The Supreme Court upheld the verdict PN and PT, rejected the appeal Chan.

July 6, 2011 Sukumaran cassation to the Supreme Court was rejected.

May 13, 2012 Chan appeal for clemency to President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono.

July 9, 2012 Sukumaran appeal for clemency to President Yudhoyono.

December 11, 2014 President Joko Widodo explained that he would not grant clemency to the convicted drug-related crime.

January 7, 2015 Jokowi President refused clemency filed Sukumaran.

January 22, 2015 Chan also did not receive a pardon from President Jokowi.

February 4, 2015 Request for reconsideration Chan and Sukumaran rejected.

February 13, 2015 The judge who sentenced Chan and Sukumaran reported to the Judicial Commission for alleged violations of the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct of Judges (KEPPH).

February 24, 2015 Jakarta State Administrative Court rejected the lawsuit Chan and Sukumaran against presidential decree which refused to grant clemency.

6 April 2015 TUN High Court rejected the appeal filing Chan and Sukumaran over their objections against the decision of the Administrative Court and the president's decision rejecting their clemency.

9 April 2015 Through his lawyer, Chan and Sukumaran suing Article 11 paragraph 1 of Law No. 5 of 2010 on clemency to the Constitutional Court. Follow the discussion and send us your opinion via the form below or click

On February 13, 2006, Denpasar District Court sentenced Lawrence and Rush with life imprisonment. Then on February 15, Nguyen, Chen, and Norman was also sentenced to life imprisonment by the judges. On 26 April 2006, sentenced Lawrence, Nguyen, Chen, Czugaj and Norman was reduced to 20 years in prison by the appeal, and Norman became a death sentence. Chan and Sukumaran still sentenced to death, and Stephens remained sentenced to life imprisonment.

On January 13, 2011, it is known that the Supreme Court rejected extraordinary attempts PK penalties proposed by Stephens, so the decision is returned back to the Denpasar District Court, which is a life sentence. It is a bit of a trip Bali Nine's scandalous that occurred in Bali some time ago.

No comments:

Post a Comment